This guide answers the most common LOTO questions we hear from safety and operations teams, and highlights where procedures often fall short.
Picture this.
It’s 5:15 AM at a major UK food manufacturing plant. The early shift is underway, prepping the packing line for a high-volume production run. A technician steps in to clear a blockage in the conveyor belt. The line supervisor thinks the system’s been isolated, the tag is on the control panel.
But the isolation point? It’s 12 metres away, on the far side of the plant. A second operator, unaware of the jam, resets the control system.
The conveyor jolts to life.
The technician’s arm is caught before anyone can reach the emergency stop.
Scenarios like this aren’t rare. They happen when critical information is siloed. When paperwork is out of date. When isolation procedures are improvised instead of embedded. And when time pressure leads to assumptions.
In industries where high-speed machinery, moving parts and pressurised systems are part of daily operations, Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) isn’t a box to tick. It’s a basic line of defence.
This guide answers the most common LOTO questions we hear from safety and operations teams, and highlights where procedures often fall short.
Lockout/Tagout is a method of physically isolating machinery or systems to protect workers during maintenance or servicing.
The goal is simple: stop machines starting up or energy being released while someone is in harm’s way.
Stored energy goes far beyond electricity. In food production, infrastructure or utilities, the following are common:
Any one of these can cause serious injury if not fully isolated and discharged.
Responsibility typically lies with the person performing the maintenance or repair task. They should apply their own lock and tag. But wider responsibility also sits with:
A single person taking control of the whole LOTO process isn’t enough. It requires shared accountability across teams, especially where shift handovers or subcontractors are involved.
A robust LOTO procedure involves:
LOTO should never be rushed or left to memory. It needs to be written, taught and tested.
See: The Safe Isolation of Plant and Equipment (HSG 253) - Health and Safety Executive
Whilst LOTO doesn't have an explicit regulation, LOTO practices support compliance with multiple UK regulations, including:
Each of these frameworks requires:
From what we’ve seen, LOTO failures usually happen because:
In food factories and rail maintenance depots alike, communication gaps are often the weakest link.
Absolutely. LOTO should connect directly with:
If isolation is treated as a standalone step, it’s more likely to be missed. But when it’s embedded across workflows, the risk of error drops significantly.
Whether you’re running a production line, maintaining overhead power lines, or clearing a blocked valve on a remote site, LOTO is one of the simplest, and most essential safety tools available.
Done well, it protects people, keeps operations running smoothly, and helps organisations stay on the right side of the law.
Done poorly, it’s a gamble. And when the stakes are this high, that’s not something anyone can afford.
Want to reduce the admin burden around compliance while keeping your teams protected?
Visibly helps operational and safety leaders stay audit-ready and aligned across multiple sites and subcontractors.